Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Hosking on asset sales

Mike Hosking's daily breakfast radio programme on Newstalk ZB begins each morning with an editorial piece. Hosking later posts the transcript of his editorials on the Newstalk website.

This morning, unsurprising, Hosking commented about asset sales and the Mixed Ownership Model; he opines:

So the legislation for the asset float has passed. It would be nice to think those who don’t like it accept it as being part of the process of democracy. The Government has a right to do this - they campaigned on it, the won an election on it, they have the numbers in the house. That’s how democracy works. And perhaps we need to see some of the opposition for what it is. I watched on the news last night some of the protest. Did you see it? How many were there? 12? 15? 20? That’s not a protest and it’s not really opposition. It’s bored people looking for attention.
If there is a failure on the Government’s part in this it’s their inability to sell the concept, to gain broad support. There is not a poll that says a majority of us back the idea but ironically in the polls that tell us the bulk don’t like it, they also show that the majority are keen to buy a stake. So the reality is if we had a choice we wouldn’t sell but if we’re going to, we don’t want to miss out on a slice of the action.

Hosking is right on the money here, in our ever-humble opinion; to quote his words "The Government has a right to do this - they campaigned on it, the won an election on it, they have the numbers in the house. That’s how democracy works.". It is indeed how democracy works, and yet still the Left tries to circumvent democracy by pushing for a CIR, although in this case it should be retitled a PPIR; Political Party Initiated Referendum.

The fact that more thasn half of Labour and Green Party voters surveyed by Key Research would buy SOE shares if able simply underlies the Government's desire that shares remain in the hands of New Zealanders. We blieve that it is highly likely that the share issue for Mighty River Power will be oversubscribed.

Labour, the Greens and the Mana Party will doubtless keep beating the drum to try and keep this issue alive, but even their supporters have acknowldged that the partial sale of state assets will happen, and if you can't beat 'em you should join 'em. When the sky doesn't fall in, electricity prices don't rise, assets are started from the Future Investment Fund and investors start reveing a dividend on their investments, they will wonder what all the white noise was about. 

5 comments:

Judge Holden said...

Why do you keep repeating the same talking point fib about the CIR? Really don't want the public to have their say do you?

The government did not win the election on asset sales, they won in spite of it. And poor Hosking has no credibility after taking secret backhanders to promote Sky City. Real journalists don't do that.

"The fact that more thasn (sic) half of Labour and Green Party voters surveyed by Key Research would buy SOE shares if able simply underlies (sic) the Government's desire that shares remain in the hands of New Zealanders.

What does that even mean? One thing's for sure an that is that the proceeds from the sale that don't go on the groceries will go directly to the government's chums. Irrigation scheme anyone?

Anonymous said...

The Old Boys are snickering into their G&T's today, what!

Mike said...

KS your opinions prove to be of little merit. The evidence in your arguments are non-existent.
Is this a blog for discussion or a soap box for yourself? Comments may as well be turned off for the amount of serious fact-based debate you engage in. You are obviously in the pocket of someone in PR or the hierarchy of who the hell knows, I opine.


Warmest,
Mike

Anonymous said...

I wonder if Mike Hosking got paid to wrtite that? He seems perfectly willingg to take Sky City's money and not disclose it.

Anonymous said...

My only reservation as to asset sales is that the 49% seems arbitrary if it is applied to all of the assets being sold. Surely some of the assets perform better than some of the others...therefore some may warrant a greater or lesser % being sold. The sales ought be pushed through without delay no matter what the % being sold is though.

Cadwallader