The Court of Appeal has spoken. It has affirmed Phillip Field's convictions and sentence for bribery and corruption. The Herald reports:
Disgraced former politician Phillip Field has failed to overturn his conviction on fraud charges or have his six-year jail sentence reduced.
Field was jailed in October last year after being convicted by a jury in the High Court in Auckland of 11 charges of bribery and corruption as a Member of Parliament and 15 charges of perverting the course of justice.
He was charged after then prime minister Helen Clark ordered an inquiry into allegations Field had traded immigration favours for tiling, painting or plastering work on his properties in New Zealand and Samoa by Thai nationals.
The Court of Appeal released its decision today and said Justice Rodney Hansen had correctly interpreted the law, directed the jury and allowed evidence.
It also found the convictions were right and the sentence should be upheld.
The perversion of justice charges were very serious, the finding said.
"Mr Field had been manipulative and adaptive and not only lied himself, but procured others to lie as well and create false documents in an endeavour to head off the consequences of his wrongdoing.
Phillip Field was a Labour Party electorate MP and a Minister in Helen Clark's government when these offences were committed. The initial inquiry convened by Helen Clark and undertaken by Noel Ingram QC had such narrow terms of reference that its findings were largely pre-determined. Field was only suspended from the Labour caucus when he threatened to stand as an independant MP.
When the Ingram report was released, there was an Urgent Debate in Parliament on its conclusions. Among other things, Labour MP's said:
Dr Michael Cullen: So Mr Field has some matters to work through with the Labour leadership and the Labour whips. But he works incredibly hard on behalf of his constituents. He has people coming to him from all over Auckland for assistance, not just in immigration cases but in many other cases. He works harder on those matters than I suspect the entire National Party caucus does on constituency cases. If that is what he is guilty of, then I am sure he is happy to plead guilty to working hard on behalf of his constituents.
Phillip Field: I am delighted that the Ingram report has now finally been completed and that I have been cleared of the serious, false allegations of conflict of interest. Over the past 9 months my personal honesty and integrity have been attacked, and those attacks were extremely unpleasant and hurtful, not only to me but to my wife, family, and community. Yet I have known all along that the allegations were false and defamatory, and I believe that those say more about the accusers than me. I repeat again in this House that the only thing I am guilty of is going the extra mile for those in a desperate situation who come to me for help. This may involve what is implied in the report with regard to the question of judgment, as my colleague who spoke previously mentioned. I can say that I am human and that we all occasionally make mistakes and errors of judgment, but that does not remove the genuine intention to help people in need. It has been frustrating that it has taken so long for my name to be cleared, but, in the end, I am satisfied that justice has been done.
The following week in the General Debate, Phil Goff said this, in response to allegations of corruption against Field by Dr Lockwood Smith:
All I do is invite that member to have the courage to make whatever inference he wants to make, outside of this House, and I will pull the rug out from under his feet so quickly he will not know which country he is in. I invite the member to have the courage to do that, but I know that member will not have the courage because there is no substance.
History will show that there WAS indeed substance to the allegations of corruption against Phillip Field. As mentioned above, the second-highest Court in the land has affirmed the convictions and sentence.
Labour is still silent on it's former MP and Minister. When Field was convicted, the only comment from the Labour Party came from Darren Hughes who said that Labour "acknowledged" the verdicts. There has never been a word of condemnation from the Labour Party.
It is time for Labour to break the silence. What say you, Labour MP's?