It would seem that Paula Bennet's promise to crack down on those rorting the welfare system is happening. The Dom-Post reports:
An unemployed Wellington man who boasted he was living on the dole to run court crusades on social issues has been told to report for an immediate work test.
Benjamin Easton, who has lodged an Environment Court appeal to stop Manners Mall being turned into a buses-only road, told The Dominion Post on Tuesday he was "deliberately and directly" on the dole so he could bring "the people's challenge to the courts".
"It is a sacrifice, really. I am perfectly capable of earning."
Social Development Minister Paula Bennett said she was "appalled" by the comments, and Work and Income officials had called Mr Easton in for an immediate work test after reading them.
She would not comment on what that would involve in his specific case, but said his views indicated he was in the category of beneficiaries to be targeted under a new regime of work tests due this year.
"It's exactly the type of person that our welfare changes are meant to identify and actually move off a benefit and into work. There will be obligations on people like him that they must meet."
Nine years of a government giving incentives NOT to work is nine years too long. We applaud Paula Bennett's quick action to introduce Benjamin Easton to the real world; the world where no-one owes anyone a living, and where one has to work for their dosh. It's the reality for most of us, and it will doubtless come as a shock to "crusaders" and single-issue nutters such as Easton.
And we welcome this from John Key's government:
The row comes as Ms Bennett prepares new work-test rules that will see people on the dole lose their benefit after a year if they cannot show an honest attempt to find work.
"If you say, 'well, actually, I haven't done anything and I live deliberately and directly on the unemployment benefit so I can bring the people's challenge to the courts and to the system', then we will cancel your benefit."
She is also planning compulsory work tests for sickness beneficiaries deemed fit to work part-time and domestic purposes beneficiaries whose youngest child is six.
Ms Bennett said she wanted a simplified system for work tests, with graduated sanctions rather than the current sole sanction of complete suspension or cancellation.
Paula Bennett will not get any argument from us on these proposals. They are overdue, and absolutely necessary. Doubtless there will be the normal wailing and gnashing of teeth from the usual sources (Sue Bradford will be to the fore, screaming "beneficiary-bashing"), but we suspect that the majority of New Zealanders will be right behind the government on this issue.
And if they want to bleat, the whingers whould blame Benjamin Easton, whose big mouth and big boasts have made him Paula Bennett's poster boy!