Thursday, November 11, 2010

Breaking ranks ...

Oh dear. It's only been a week since the triumphant announcement that 225 school Boards of Trustees planned to fight to government over National Standards. Organisers were confident that hundreds more boards would join them. The Boards of Trustees might be talking tough, but when the Ministry of Education rings up, it's a different story altogether - the Herald reports:

Nearly a third of the schools that said they had no confidence in National Standards have told the Ministry of Education they do in fact plan to implement the controversial scheme.

A group called Boards Taking Action Coalition said last week that the trustees from 225 schools around the country had issued a vote of no confidence in National Standards. As a result those schools would refuse to set student achievements targets for next year until the system was reviewed.

The next day the ministry starting contacting all of the protesting schools' boards of trustees to check the claim.

The Herald has learned 66 of the 225 coalition boards indicated their schools planned to implement the standards in full. A further 109 said they would take some form of action or were yet to decide if they would implement the standards in full. Fifty schools are yet to be contacted.


Oh dear; oh dear; oh dear. The likes of Perry Rush, Jane Forrest, Simon Mitchell and Marlene Campbell will be gutted. Schools are breaking ranks with the rebels, and all the tough talking of last week is coming to nowt. The plan by principals and teacher unions to hijack Boards of Trustees is out in the open.

Yes indeed; this is the result of the kind of planning and plotting at which the left excels. But on this occasion, there are too many people involved and not enough solidarity, and there have been leaks aplenty. The Dom-Post has one - read on:

A group of rebel principals plotted to "quietly take over" an association representing 90 per cent of school boards in an effort to overwhelm the national standards debate, leaked emails suggest.

An email exchange shows principals involved in a boycott of the standards discussed "dealing with" the New Zealand School Trustees Association.

"The easiest way is for us to quietly take over regional organisations of NZSTA ... Just imagine NZSTA run by principals!" an email written by Hora Hora School principal Pat Newman states.

Mr Newman is former president of the Principals' Federation and the immediate past president of the Tai Tokerau Principals Association.

He is one of two Labour Party members vying for selection to stand as the Labour candidate in Whangarei next year.

His email was sent to, among others, Denise Torrey, president of the Canterbury Primary Principals Association; Frances Nelson, president of the national primary teachers' union; Iain Taylor, president of the Auckland Primary Principals Association, and Perry Rush, Island Bay School principal.

Marlene Campbell, principal of Invercargill's Salford School and a member of the Southland Primary Principals Association executive, which this week called Education Minister Anne Tolley "Minister Hitler", was also a recipient. All have been vocal critics of the national standards.

Mr Taylor responded to Mr Newman's August 20 email with: "Oh that the go!! Great thinking ... loved ya email to her too ... man she awful!!" Mr Taylor was referring to NZSTA president Lorraine Kerr, who has refused to criticise or fully endorse the standards.

The NZSTA is the national organisation for school boards.


So that's how it was going to work, dear readers. Of course, it won't happen now because the insidious nature of the plot is now out in the open, which is a darned good thing in our always-humble opinion.

But what saddens us the most is that the image of school principals, most of whom care deeply about the education and welfare of the children at their schools, has been tarnished by the actions of a few. The political game-playing is not what principals are employed to do. It's sad that some have shown far more loyalty to organisations such as the NZEI and the NZPF that to their employers and to the children entrusted to them. That's a crying shame.

20 comments:

alex Masterley said...

Sunlight is a great disinfectant.
People who hide under rocks don't like it.

Anonymous said...

the real crying shame is how fucked up the education system is becoming under neoliberalism's 'one sze fits all' approach to learning.

when the effects of this system come to light we will, like the UK and USA, throw national standards in the bin where they rightly belong.

Real change only comes through struggle. Surely as followers of a once tiny, persecuted religious sect you could understnd that? Or not?

Santa

Ant Olly said...

Let's shine some sunlight on the person who writes this blog. Starting with a name, then an occupation. Then we'll see how willing they are to stand by all of their posts. Until then there is no credibility unless they can explain why name suppression is a good thing in this instance.

Inventory2 said...

@ Ant - ironic that you call for a different standard to that which you apply to yourself; a parody of a name.

Inventory2 said...

Nice try Anon, but off the mark.

Anonymous said...

Why the FUCK are my taxes paying for ANY OF THIS.

If you love your kids you'll buy them a real education - not rely on taxpayer funded childminding!

Every one of these principals should be fired immediately.

Anonymous said...

Why? cos you want your nurse etc to have had an education and knows what the fuck they're doing you fucking half-wit - you need an education in what it means to be a 'social animal' and live alongside people who have the same rights to a satisfying life as yr own sorry arse.

you fuckwad. die in agony soon please.

James Stephenson said...

Why don't you get your own fucking blog if you want to have schizoid conversations with yourself Anon/Ant/Santa. Hey I miss your American persona, where's he gone? Not his turn for control of the typing fingers?

Ant Olly said...

INV2 that is my given name. I find it offensive that you call it a parody. What's the problem with YOUR name? Why are you so scared to put it out there? Is it fear or is it because what you write is not worth putting your name to? Or is it 'just because'. I recall a post (google cache is a useful tool) about Whanganui councillors that had you running scared when someone was going to out you. Name suppression only suits you when it suits you? Is that what it is?

's little helper said...

James. You seem perturbed and flustered. Bobulate yourself.

big news said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
big news said...

I2 before writing these posts you'd do well to find out what these schools have signed up to, rather than believing info from journalists who don't know themselves.

Inventory2 said...

Appreciate that Big News ...

alex Masterley said...

mmmmmm trolls.
This topic never ceases to attract them.
It's good however that education of our children attracts such passion.

Anonymous said...

@Comment deleted: that's a good one.

Chairman Mao said...

Alex, you're not yourself today. I noticed the improvement instantly.

alx masterley said...

Chairman Mao,
May I suggest that you eat the little red book.
Plenty of dietary fibre in it.

alex Masterley said...

Oops typo

Anonymous said...

"you fuckwad. die in agony soon please."

I just love when lefties show their true loving natures.. poor dear, maybe some therapy is called for. Until then why not hang out at Chris Trot(sky)er's blog. Misery loves company don't you know.

Ozy Mandias said...

There is alot of agro here at the moment. Just relax people.