Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Grabbing straws

This morning's Herald editroial should be a very salutory lesson to John Key and National. Rather than a "how-to" guide for articulating policy, this editorial is a lesson in "how NOT to" over the spat between Bill English and Maurice Williamson. With Parliament set to resume today, the last thing National needs to be doing is handing Annette King gift-wrapped patsy questions to hand out to compliant backbenchers - questions such as "What reports has the Minister read...."

As the editorial notes in its close:

Subtlety has no place in election campaigns. Helen Clark would have known she was wildly misrepresenting Mr Williamson's words when she said National's tolls would claw back its tax cuts. Tax is compulsory, tolls need not be. The projects cited by Mr Williamson included tunnelled sections of Auckland's western ring road through Waterview and a Northern Motorway extension to Warkworth, both of which would leave reasonable alternative routes available.

A Northern Motorway extension from Albany to Puhoi will open next year with a toll of $2. Transport Minister Annette King says the charge will cover only half the construction cost even at the motorway's maximum use. She says Mr Williamson misses the point that "you can't set a toll so high that people won't use the road".

Private enterprise understands that point well. It is fundamental to the economics of an investment that the product can be sold at a price people are willing to pay. The Government's Transport Agency possibly underestimates the amount motorists might pay for a faster, more convenient route. In a public-private partnership the private investor is better placed to make the estimate, as long as the partnership does not indemnify the private participant against losses.

Mr English, like Mrs King, appears to have accepted the agency's view that $2 is the maximum that can be charged before use declines. If National is going to set that sort of heavily subsidised toll, there seems no public value in a partnership with private interests.

Mr Williamson's candour was in accord with the logic of his party's stated policy, Mr English's correction of him leaves serious doubt of the policy's integrity. Sometimes caution is not the safest political course. National has merely muddied its water again and given the Government another straw to grab.

3 comments:

Adolf Fiinkensein said...

Naaaah. I think the Herald is wrong. Storm in a tea cup stuff and, unlike tapergate, National handled the damage control well. That is the real issue. There will always be gaffes on both sides. What's important is that they are seen to be cleaned up quickly. In this case, the clear message which has resounded with the public is 'don't worry, you won't be charged unaffordable tolls.'

Inventory2 said...

I agree that it's storm-in-a-teacup stuff Adolf, but it's not a good look, and it provides Labour with question-fodder on a day when National should be going on the attack, not having to be on the defensive. It'll blow over quickly, but it is the kind of behaviour that the Nats will have to be wary of as the campaign gets moving.

Anonymous said...

Mork calling Bill English, come in Bill English....

SHUT THE F... UP YOU STUPID MUPPET.